Krauthammer: Deception at Core of Obama Plans

Krauthammer: Deception at Core of Obama Plans:

And yet with our financial house on fire, Obama makes clear both in his speech and his budget that the essence of his presidency will be the transformation of health care, education and energy. Four months after winning the election, six weeks after his swearing in, Obama has yet to unveil a plan to deal with the banking crisis.

What's going on? "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste," said Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. "This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not do before."

Things. Now we know what they are. The markets' recent precipitous decline is a reaction not just to the absence of any plausible bank rescue plan, but also to the suspicion that Obama sees the continuing financial crisis as usefully creating the psychological conditions -- the sense of crisis bordering on fear-itself panic -- for enacting his "Big Bang" agenda to federalize and/or socialize health care, education and energy, the commanding heights of post-industrial society.

Clever politics, but intellectually dishonest to the core. Health, education and energy -- worthy and weighty as they may be -- are not the cause of our financial collapse. And they are not the cure. The fraudulent claim that they are both cause and cure is the rhetorical device by which an ambitious president intends to enact the most radical agenda of social transformation seen in our lifetime.

Also see David Brooks at the NY Times: A Moderate Manifesto (via LGF). How could anyone who's been paying attention think Obama was a moderate?

WSJ: Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow:

It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street and the growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in part, of the realization that our new president's policies are designed to radically re-engineer the market-based U.S. economy, not just mitigate the recession and financial crisis.

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic center has quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the best policies of past Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy on taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare reform and a balanced budget, for instance -- President Obama is returning to Jimmy Carter's higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian defense drawdown.

Mr. Obama's $3.6 trillion budget blueprint, by his own admission, redefines the role of government in our economy and society. The budget more than doubles the national debt held by the public, adding more to the debt than all previous presidents -- from George Washington to George W. Bush -- combined. It reduces defense spending to a level not sustained since the dangerous days before World War II, while increasing nondefense spending (relative to GDP) to the highest level in U.S. history. And it would raise taxes to historically high levels (again, relative to GDP). And all of this before addressing the impending explosion in Social Security and Medicare costs.

New and expanded refundable tax credits would raise the fraction of taxpayers paying no income taxes to almost 50% from 38%. This is potentially the most pernicious feature of the president's budget, because it would cement a permanent voting majority with no stake in controlling the cost of general government.

From the poorly designed stimulus bill and vague new financial rescue plan, to the enormous expansion of government spending, taxes and debt somehow permanently strengthening economic growth, the assumptions underlying the president's economic program seem bereft of rigorous analysis and a careful reading of history.

Permalink | Comments? | Tags: Barack Obama, Opinions/Politics | id 8736

13:19 (utc-6)
edited: 15:44 (utc-6)

 

Hot Air » Blog Archive » The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama

Hot Air » Blog Archive » The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama (via). Huge post with lots of video. Haven't gotten to read or look at this at all, but I wanted to link it for later.

Also, both John Bolton and Madeleine Albright consider it "self evident" and "a statement of fact" that foreign leaders view Obama as weak and are likely to test him early in his presidency.

Permalink | Comments? | Tags: Barack Obama | id 8611

14:39 (utc-5)
edited: 14:42 (utc-5)

 

Thomas Sowell on Obama

Thomas Sowell on Obama (via):

Associations are very different from alliances. Allies are not just people who happen to be where you are or who happen to be doing the same things you do. You choose allies deliberately for a reason. The kind of allies you choose says something about you.

Jeremiah Wright, Father Michael Pfleger, William Ayers and Antoin Rezko are not just people who happened to be at the same place at the same time as Barack Obama. They are people with whom he chose to ally himself for years, and with some of whom some serious money changed hands.

Some gave political support, and some gave financial support, to Obama's election campaigns, and Obama in turn contributed either his own money or the taxpayers' money to some of them. That is a familiar political alliance— but an alliance is not just an "association" from being at the same place at the same time.

Obama could have allied himself with all sorts of other people. But, time and again, he allied himself with people who openly expressed their hatred of America. No amount of flags on his campaign platforms this election year can change that.

He recommends The Case Against Barack Obama, by David Freddoso.

Permalink | Comments? | Tags: Barack Obama | id 8596

20:02 (utc-5)
edited: 20:04 (utc-5)

 

Obama's attack ad backfires

Looks like Obama's stupid attack ad on McCain has backfired. Goldberg also links to this McCain interview with the NYT from a few months ago, that, as Goldberg points out, makes McCain sound "awfully web savvy". The rest of it was a good read too.

Heh, Charles links another article (from back in 2000) similarly showing how false Obama's ad was:

In certain ways, McCain was a natural Web candidate. Chairman of the Senate Telecommunications Subcommittee and regarded as the U.S. Senate’s savviest technologist, McCain is an inveterate devotee of email. His nightly ritual is to read his email together with his wife, Cindy. The injuries he incurred as a Vietnam POW make it painful for McCain to type. Instead, he dictates responses that his wife types on a laptop. “She’s a whiz on the keyboard, and I’m so laborious,” McCain admits.

Permalink | Comments? | Tags: Barack Obama, Election 2008, John McCain | id 8552

13:56 (utc-5)
edited: 17:22 (utc-5)