|
| ← Carl Sassenrath: Time for Big Changes | Asinine accessors, or preposterous properties → |

Clay (http://claysmith.be/) wrote:
Richard@Home (http://richardathome.no-ip.com) wrote:
I've been using HTML-Kit (www.chami.com) for pretty much all of my web developer career. One of its big plusses for me is that its free AND it lets you edit files remotely (via a build in FTP client). Open the file, make your changes, click save and the file is automatically uploaded to the server.
It's a bit of a resource hog, but because it does pretty much everything I don't need to have 4 different applications open.
Its got a wealth of 3rd party add-ins that cover pretty much everything you could think of too.
Well worth a look.
Keith (http://keithdevens.com/) wrote:
HTML-Kit doesn't support SFTP, does it? FTP-only support does me no good.
I've tried HTML-Kit a few different times over the years and never stuck with it. I don't remember why... maybe it's too obviously focused on HTML for my taste, or maybe I felt like it was a bit of a resource hog.
Ben wrote:
Keith I always thought you were an EditPlus guy? I could have sworn in the past you used to blog about it.
Keith (http://keithdevens.com/) wrote:
Yes, I used to use EditPlus (and still use it occasionally just because it's so much faster than jEdit). Now that I've officially ditched jEdit and don't need to depend on an editor to have SFTP/SSH support, I'm going to evaluate PSPad, and possibly Crimson Editor and ConTEXT to see which one I like best between them and EditPlus.
Thing is, I like to use free software not even so much becuase I don't have to pay for it (I've bought two separate versions of EditPlus, and still have my current license sitting around somewhere), but because for commercial software I have to manage the license and it's a hassle. If I choose a free editor I can just install it everywhere and not worry about it. In addition, EditPlus's development is pretty much in maintenance mode whereas PSPad seems to be under active development, and PSPad has scripting! 
Brian wrote:
How about UltraEdit?
http://www.ultraedit.com/
I've been using it for all types of coding for years with great joy. Speedy, highlighting, all those typical bells and whistles. It has an FTP option but I have never used it, so I don't know if it does what you need there.
I highly recommend giving it a try if you haven't already.
Jonathan Aquino (http://jonathanaquino.com) wrote:
Keith - Another editor to try: the very popular SciTE. I use it with WinSCP when I'm not using jEdit.
Feel free to post a comment below. Please see my comment policy.
Formatting Rules (No HTML):
Generated in about 0.114s.
(Used 8 db queries)
Hey thanks for the tip! I've been using JEdit ever since you mentioned way back in January of 2003, but I've noticed similar problems, mainly the startup time and the clunky interface. I'll try out the WinSCP/PSPad combo, but keep us posted on your editor choice.