Keith Devens .com

The "intelligent design" ruling

I just wrote a post on the recent "intelligent design" court ruling, in a comment.

Update: Ned Batchelder has a reasonable post on the issue:

I think the three or four paragraphs of disclaimer the ID folks wanted read was not such a big deal, and would have been a great jumping off point for a discussion about what science is and is not. An entire class (or more) could be given over to the topic. It wouldn't be teaching intelligent design, it would be teaching the philosophy of science with the current ID debate as a backdrop.

Note: comments are closed on this post so that I can keep any discussion centralized on post I linked to up top.

Permalink | Tags: Opinions/Politics, Religion, Science | id 7778

06:51 (utc-5)
edited: 17:43 (utc-5)