KBD

Keith Devens .com

Sunday, September 7, 2008 Flag waving
A charlatan makes obscure what is clear; a thinker makes clear what is obscure. – Hugh Kingsmill

Archive: April 05, 2005

← April 04, 2005April 06, 2005 →

Daily link icon Tuesday, April 5, 2005

The Washington Times: Sandy Berger's crime

The Washington Times: Sandy Berger's crime:

Martha Stewart went to jail for lying to federal investigators. But for lying after stealing highly classified documents from the National Archives -- in an apparent attempt to alter the historical record on terrorism, no less -- former Clinton national security adviser and Kerry campaign adviser Sandy Berger will get a small fine and slap on the wrist. He will pay $10,000 and get no jail time. His security clearance will be suspended until around the end of the Bush administration -- meaningless for a career Democrat like Mr. Berger. It makes us wonder who at the Department of Justice is responsible for letting such a serious offense go virtually unpunished.

For those who suspect that different rules apply at the top, a case like this is reason for cynicism. Meanwhile, his associates from the Clinton years are silent, perhaps hoping the scandal will blow over so Mr. Berger can remain a don of the Democratic foreign-policy establishment.

We can only speculate as to why the Department of Justice would agree to such lenient terms for the offense. Perhaps career employees or holdovers with ties to Democrats are responsible. Perhaps the Bush administration went soft. Whatever the reason, we can be reasonably sure it wasn't done for reasons of national security, justice or truth.

Via Glenn.

And more from Lorie at PoliPundit and David Limbaugh:

Where are the Democrats on this issue? Are they not the ones who have been obsessed with retrospectives and endless self-flagellating investigations into how our intelligence agencies failed, implying that we could have prevented 9/11?

Given the gravity they attach to these investigations, how can they possibly understate the significance of Berger’s crime? His actions – even if you naively believe they weren’t in furtherance of a Clinton cover-up – grossly undermined the integrity of our investigative process and national security in general.

Can you imagine if a high-level actor in the Bush administration stole and destroyed documents related to the 9/11 investigation?

  1. USNews.com: John Leo: End of the Schiavo affair:

    The behavior of the news media: Terrible. "Pro-life" columnist Nat Hentoff of the Village Voice called it "the worst case of liberal media bias I've seen yet." Many stories and headlines were politically loaded. Small example of large disdain: On air, a CBS correspondent called the Florida rallies a "religious roadshow," a term unlikely to have been applied to Martin Luther King Jr.'s civil rights demonstrations or any other rallies meeting CBS's approval. More important, it was hard to find news that Michael Schiavo had provided no therapy or rehabilitation for his wife since 1994 and even blocked the use of antibiotics when Terri developed a urinary infection. And the big national newspapers claimed as a fact that Michael Schiavo's long-delayed recollection of Terri's wish to die, supported only by hearsay from Michael's brother and a sister-in-law, met the standard for "clear and convincing evidence" of consent. It did nothing of the sort, particularly with two of Terri's friends testifying the opposite. The media covered the intervention by Congress as narrowly political and unwarranted. They largely fudged the debates over whether Terri Schiavo was indeed in a persistent vegetative state and whether tube-feeding meant that Schiavo was on life support.

    Via Glenn.

       (0)
  2. Cox & Forkum: Clinton Legacy Redux (on Sandy Berger). I want to throw up.

    Update: More.

       (0) Tags: [Opinions/Politics]
  3. WHEDONesque: Jane Espenson's "Finding Serenity" is on the shelves! Gotta get me some... when school ends (sigh!).

       (0) Tags: [TV/Movies]
  4. Google maps integrates satellite photos:

    Now when you type an address into Google Maps, you can click the 'Satellite' link and see a view of the area. You can zoom, move the view by dragging, and even resize the window just like the normal 'Maps' view.

    Wow!

    Update: Ack! Why is NJ all gross?

       (0)
← April 04, 2005April 06, 2005 →
September 2008
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930 



RSS feed RSS feed for Keith's Weblog
Atom feed Atom feed for Keith's Weblog
Weblog archive
Recent comments
  on 7 posts

Recent comments XML

new⇒Trogdor tattoo!!

Oh, so cute, wowoowow....

Kathy Mead: Sep 7, 6:07am

new⇒I hate Norton Antivirus

Long long live AVG I love you!...

kevin sands: Sep 6, 7:31pm

I hate ASP.NET

CF, why pick that piece of trash?​Cold Confusion. Is it finally​really a OO...

ColdConfusion: Sep 5, 8:36pm

Maps of Iraq

This is for Linda, I will be​visiting that site some time in the​near futur...

Bob: Sep 5, 1:20pm

Girls, please don't get breast implants

Well alright I just read my above​comment and I wanted to add​this...I shou...

76.66.140.8: Sep 4, 7:31pm

Spider solitaire

I don't think the question was​necessarily if there are unbeatable​games.  ...

Jared: Sep 4, 12:44pm

Convert Pantone Colors to RGB and Hex - Color Conversion Chart

The colors on those website don't​seem to relate to the pantone data​we hav...

blah: Sep 3, 10:12am

Generated in about 0.057s.

(Used 7 db queries)

mobile phone