<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Keith's Weblog: Comments on &quot;www. is deprecated&quot;</title>
		<description>Keith's Weblog: Comments on &quot;www. is deprecated&quot;, posted on January 30, 2004</description>
		<link>http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2004/Jan/30/www.deprecated</link>

		<category>This website</category>
		<language>en-us</language>
		

		<item>
			<title>by 63.247.137.230</title>
			<link>http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2004/Jan/30/www.deprecated#comment3847</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithdevens.com/weblog/4686#comment3847</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;blockquote class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just came across no-www.org. Check it out. My site validates&lt;br /&gt;
as &amp;quot;Class B&amp;quot;, the &amp;quot;optimal no-www compliance level&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;Only reason mine doesn't is that I echo the HTTP_HOST, so the front page always has the full URL that you go to, and so the content is different for every alias.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://i-went-to-no-www.org-and-got-a-dumb-NA-result.abulman.co.uk/&quot;&gt;http://i-went-to-no-www.org-and-got-a-dumb-NA-result.abulman.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>by Erik</title>
			<link>http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2004/Jan/30/www.deprecated#comment3848</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithdevens.com/weblog/4686#comment3848</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;Good find Keith, I just added the necessary ReWrite rule to my .htaccess file.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>by Elliot Lee</title>
			<link>http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2004/Jan/30/www.deprecated#comment4272</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithdevens.com/weblog/4686#comment4272</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 07:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Though if Class B is the best, I wonder why they didn't make it Class A instead?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;Class A is the most common, and not the best. The &amp;quot;best&amp;quot; for deprecating www is Class C. Class B is optimal, but not &amp;quot;best&amp;quot; (Class C means trying www. to access the site doesn't work at all).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;So it seems they're in reverse, or are we?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
