Keith Devens .com |
Thursday, November 20, 2008 | ![]() |
| That which yields, is not always weak. – Jacqueline Carey (Kushiel's Dart) | ||
|
| ← Getting a high-resolution console in Linux | ECMAScript for XML → |

Jeff wrote:
Keith (http://keithdevens.com/) wrote:
Thanks for the review. Because I have the Logitech Mouseman Dual Optical, I may not have the same problem with skippage between hexagon lines since the mouse has two sensors. I'm glad to know it's smell-free.
ideoplastos (http://www.ideoplastos.net) wrote:
Dude, why don't you just wash your current pad to get rid of the smell? If it doesn't work (still smells, gets screwed up), then buy the new one.
Keith (http://keithdevens.com/) wrote:
I left my current pad in the sun and the rain for days and it still smells.
ideoplastos (http://www.ideoplastos.net) wrote:
Does it smell ...like Fresh Mex? I like Fresh Mex.
Wash it!
Feel free to post a comment below. Please see my comment policy.
Formatting Rules (No HTML):
Generated in about 0.169s.
(Used 8 db queries)

I just got an XTrac Hammer (17"x11" thin plastic pad with tiled hexagons) last week and am not totally satisfied. I own a Logitech MX500, which was having severe problems tracking on the grain of my table (stained oak, semi-glossy surface), so I decided on buying one of these to help. The pad is huge, very thin, and smell-free, but I still get some tracking problems. The most common is a small amount of vertical jitter that I believe is caused as the sensor is going along the 3mm or so wide empty channel between neighboring hexagons. I may get a Sharpie and add some noise to these areas of the pad to see if that helps.
I have not tried my first generation Optical Mouseman on it yet, which generally tracks better but has a noticeable latency when first moving it. (LED dims and sensor slows after no movement for ~1 sec to conserve power.) I've heard good things about the Logitech MX510 sensors being better, however. I have no MS or other company optical mouse, so I can't comment there.