KBD

Keith Devens .com

Monday, October 6, 2008 Flag waving
Mongol General: "What is best in life?" Conan: "To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to... – Conan (Conan the Barbarian)
← Why Python is better than JavaSlashdot: "First Ten Programs on New Install?" →

Daily link icon Tuesday, April 27, 2004

Answers in Genesis webcast

AnswersLIVE: Refuting Compromise

On this live webcast, Ken Ham (President of Answers in Genesis-US) & author Dr Jonathan Sarfati will be discussing the contents of Dr Sarfati's new book Refuting Compromise.

Check it out, 9:00 Tuesday night (Eastern time). If you have any questions about evolution/creation you'd like to have answered you can submit a question.

Hmmm... since the discussion is about Refuting Compromise, which isn't a defense of creation as such, but rather a refutation of "progressive creationism", maybe general creation/evolution questions wouldn't be welcome.

← Why Python is better than JavaSlashdot: "First Ten Programs on New Install?" →

Comments XML gif

Alan Green (http://cardboard.nu) wrote:

Ummmm.... What is "progressive creationism"?

∴ Alan Green | 27-Apr-2004 10:37pm est | http://cardboard.nu | #4445

Keith (http://keithdevens.com/) wrote:

Shoot! I forgot to listen to the program. I hope I didn't have to listen live.

Anyway, progressive creationism essentially accepts all the premises of evolution - the world is millions of years old, evolution is true (God "progressively" created mankind through directed evolution, rather than through a special act of creation as the account in Genesis states), the Biblical flood was a local event, not a global event, the "days" in Genesis are figurative "eras" and not literal days, and so on. I haven't studied the system so much, but I think that's a fair summary. AIG has some FAQs on it, you may be able to find more on their site.

The main problem with it is that it's an unbiblical philosophy. That's what the Refuting Compromise book is largely about. To give one example, the Bible teaches that death came into the world through Adam's sin, yet for progressive creation to be true there would have been death for millions of years before Adam existed. For another example, it's an unjustified exegesis to interpret the "days" in Genesis as meaning "eras" instead of literal days.

Plus, I personally think it's silly for them to accept evolution as true... I'm jaded after thinking about and studying these things for long, but evolution seems patently absurd to me... I don't know why Christians, of all people, would choose to believe in it.

Anyway, I hope this answers your question. Smiley

Keith | 27-Apr-2004 11:43pm est | http://keithdevens.com/ | #4446

Jason Davies (http://www.netspade.com/) wrote:

Isn't it annoying how people sometimes assume that evolution is the accepted theory for the origin of life and that everyone they're talking to agrees?

As a Christian I think it's difficult to consider anything other than God actually creating & designing us. Evolution just seems to be a dirty hack so people don't have to believe in a God. There are still many unanswered questions of course, but if the theory that we evolved from soup over zillions of years is true, then I'd have to become an atheist. I know that many Christians happily accept evolution but there are too many conflicts with Christianity for it to make sense.

∴ Jason Davies | 28-Apr-2004 8:34am est | http://www.netspade.com/ | #4450

Feel free to post a comment below. Please see my comment policy.

Formatting Rules (No HTML):

  • **bold**, *italic*, _underlined_, --strikeout--
  • "text"="url" creates a link, and URLs are auto-highlighted
  • Blockquote: Like e-mail, begin paragraph with > (greater-than sign)
  • Lists: begin paragraph with *,-, or + (unordered), or # (ordered)
  • Code block: ?!code:language=perl|php|sql|javascript|etc.{\n}...{\n}?!/code

:
(will be your IP address if blank)
: (optional)
(Will not be shown on site)

: (optional)
:

October 2008
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 



RSS feed RSS feed for Keith's Weblog
Atom feed Atom feed for Keith's Weblog
Weblog archive
Recent comments
  on 6 posts

Recent comments XML

new⇒Girls, please don't get breast implants

Hey everyone, 

I am new to this​blog and I have enjoyed reading all​your...

Sarah.M.: Oct 6, 9:45am

obout inc - ASP.NET controls

I like there components. I've got​it to work locally on my pc.​However I'm ...

Jeff: Oct 2, 4:43pm

Dumb substring behavior in C# (and Java)

Yes, the Substring function is not​helpful when you hit the length​problem,...

Mike Irving: Oct 2, 7:56am

YouTube - Burning Down The House: What Caused Our Economic Crisis?

> Please save another copy of the​"Burning Down The House" video as​the ori...

Keith: Sep 30, 11:05am

Johnny Walker Blue Label

I bought a 2 finger glass for 60​bucks about 5 minutes before my​wedding. I...

Ty: Sep 30, 9:52am

More on the bailout

I figured they wanted about a buck​or so from every man, woman and​child on...

Peggy McGilligan: Sep 30, 12:20am

Generated in about 0.272s.

(Used 8 db queries)

mobile phone