Home » Archive » 2003 » November » 11

Archive: November 11, 2003

← November 10, 2003

November 12, 2003 →

Tuesday, November 11, 2003

Boosting Trees applied to spam filtering?

I don't know what Boosting Trees are, but here are two papers that claim that this method will work better than Naive Bayesian methods of spam filtering. They're both called Boosting Trees for Anti-Spam Email Filtering (here's the second). I think they're essentially the same paper, though the formatting's different.

Chain link icon

Permalink | 1 Comment | Tags: Programming | id 4370

22:12 (utc-5)
edited: 22:16 (utc-5)

← November 10, 2003

November 12, 2003 →

RSS feed RSS feed for Keith's Weblog
Atom feed Atom feed for Keith's Weblog
Weblog archive
Recent comments
on 7 posts

Recent comments

Elliot Anderson,

Dude!! You theman! The reverse replacement forarray_u...

Alex Ndungu: Oct 11, 1:35am

Two Tools For Raid Stacking « A Dwarf Priest

4/10...

Keith: Oct 10, 1:48pm

Call a function from a string in Python

?!code:
some_object.__getattribute__('method_name')()
?!/code

isthe s...

Patrick Corcoran: Oct 8, 3:53pm

Spider solitaire

I have won 185 games of SpiderSolitaire at the "Difficult" level. What is...

75.179.28.113: Oct 8, 12:42pm

Hi.

I wanted to let you knowthat I wrote an article "Famous SedOne-Lin...

Peteris Krumins: Oct 8, 3:05am

Timesheet Calculator

Hadn't seen it before now, but mycompany already uses a timetracking prog...

Keith: Oct 7, 10:44am

Girls, please don't get breast implants

Hey everyone,

I am new to thisblog and I have enjoyed reading allyour...

Sarah.M.: Oct 6, 9:45am

Generated in about 0.041s.

(Used 7 db queries)