Keith Devens .com

That's pretty hilarious, actually.

This sort of thing seems to be a constant from one university to the next. I'm just now graduating from a school that has a history of being sought-after heavily by employers for CS majors (well, before the economy dove), and I've had more classes that turned out to be like this than actually being worthwhile. I think the field has been around long enough to demand a consistently valuable curriculum like in physics/math/engineering departments. I don't understand why the CS departments are still doing this crap.

What bugs me is that the button is a persistent element of the extended Frame object.

So why not build it as a member of the FrameDemo class? Its not like they're not tightly coupled by physical proximity and function.

Yep, after looking at it, I agree. But keep in mind that looking at it now for the 10 seconds it took to see what you were talking about was more analysis than I did when cutting and pasting the thing to make it run Like I said, no thinking required.

So, would I have done it myself if I were programming it? Yes. Should my teacher have programmed it that way? Yes. Do I care? No

Aww... my dog's cute.