Keith Devens .com |
Saturday, March 20, 2010 | ![]() |
| Communicating badly and then acting smug when misunderstood is not cleverness. – Randall Munroe (xkcd) | ||
|
| ← Why I don't grok (XML) namespaces | Road Trip Pictures! → |

Adam Vandenberg (http://flangy.com) wrote:
Feel free to post a comment below. Please see my comment policy.
Formatting Rules (No HTML):
Generated in about 0.139s.
(Used 8 db queries)
YES.
I've been learning Scheme recently on the theory that it never hurts to know more languages, and LISP-likes/functionals are an area I'm weak in. One of the big advantages of Scheme is the extreme regularity of syntax. It makes nearly everything composable and decomposable, which makes building abstractions really easy.
I wouldn't want to write everything in Scheme, but it sure seems handy for doing compiler-generators, which is what I'm playing around with now.