If you define science as repeatable, reliable, observational fact, it's obvious that evolution doesn't really qualify as science. People make these huge jumps; they see these tiny changes happening today, and so they conclude that all life forms have arisen from chemicals by a continuous process over millions of years. That's not science, that's a belief.
Exactly
from http://answersingenesis.org/docs/3724.asp?srcFrom=aignews
I actually had a very interesting opportunity, a head start in a sense, because at that time, these academics were dogmatically teaching the gradualistic theory of evolution as fact. They had not yet caught up with the way some fossil experts overseas were beginning to admit that there really weren't all these in-between fossils. They were proposing a new theory, evolution happening in fits and starts ("punctuated equilibrium") to try to deal with this. So I could use their admissions to point out the fallacies in what people believed to be fact.
Saturday, February 8, 2003
Permalink
Feel free to post a comment below. Please see my comment policy.
Formatting Rules (No HTML):