I feel so gross right now. I just had one of those Uncle Ben's rice dishes - something about Thai chicken. Those things are gross. Don't buy them!

Permalink | Comments? | id 1591

21:17 (utc-5)

 

Xkot: "Always flatter them a little before you lie. If you first tell a person something they want to believe, they'll be more likely to believe the rest of what you have to say"

Permalink | Comments? | id 1590

21:14 (utc-5)

 

Via diveintomark, Really funny: First Annual Geek Love Photo Contest.

"Fingering the floppy. So wrong. I love it"

Permalink | Comments? | id 1589

20:13 (utc-5)

 

A discussion about ya'll on diveintomark. I think ya'll is a great word. We've been missing a plural you in the language ever since we gave up on "thou". Of course, "thou" was singular and "you" was plural, but when we got rid of "thou" we only had "you" left for both.

I have to quote this short dissertation on the word: ""Y'all" is an abbreviation of "you all" only etymologically. "You all" means the same as "all of you", while "y'all" is simply plural. So "Do you all have books?" addressed to three people, one of whom is bookless, would have to be answered "no." But "Do y'all have books" addressed to the same three, could be answered, "Yes, Hester and I do, but Herkimer here doesn't.""

Finally, I think ya'll should be spelled "ya'll", not "y'all". "Y'all" seems awkward to me. Y'all is like Yuh-all, whereas ya'll is like "ya-all". Seems more natural, and more consistent with using 'll for we'll, etc., even though the 'll is for a different word. I'd have to get used to it, but if people wanted to I think I'd even be fine with yall being a full-fledged word in the language rather than a contraction.

Permalink | 1 Comment | id 1588

00:13 (utc-5)