KBD

Keith Devens .com

Friday, July 30, 2010 Flag waving
Follow the path. – me
← PHP for the command lineTerminator theme cover →

Daily link icon Thursday, December 19, 2002

Links of the day

Lord of the Rings movie reviews, all good.

Via Diego:

Something good to read every now and then, from the master of SF: Neal Stephenson's In the beginning there was the command line..., the best history of computers you can read in forty pages or so.

Also via Diego, News.com: The 10 biggest hype jobs of 2002

I recently heard of an IT manager who told the CIO he wanted to buy a product because it could save the department $75,000. The CIO agreed, but only if the manager agreed to cut his budget by $75,000. Needless to say, the manager decided to pass.

Via LWN, ZDNet: Is $200 the magic number for PCs?

Via Erik:

I should take a look at Test Driven Development.

Signs that I'm learning stuff in school: I just looked at this page for refinement calculus, and the first equation made total sense to me... I could read it as if I were reading English:

In the refinement calculus, specifications are written as abstract programs usually in the form of specification statements. For example, a program that assigns x an arbitrary element from set S, provided S is not empty, may be specified as:

{ ~(S = {}) } x := x' | x' in S.

The only thing that wasn't totally clear was the {} around the thing in the beginning, but I assume that means it's some kind of precondition.

The FuzzyBlog!: Cat Fight at the PHP Saloon.

Now that RSD 1.0 has been released, I'm going to take a look at it.

AmazonLookup Bookmarklet.

Via HtP, Why JSP Sucks So Hard. JSP does suck hard! I was using it at version 1.0, and it sucked hard then. I figured part of it was just 1.0'itis, but part of it was fundamentally flawed.

PHPEverywhere: Developing Reliable Software with Scripting Languages. Also discussion on LtU.

← PHP for the command lineTerminator theme cover →

Comments XML gif

M. Bean wrote:

I didn't expect you to link my forum post. But, since you did, on a whim I decided to add permalink anchor functionality to the forum so you can link directly to a certain post... the one you mentioned above being located at: http://yaysoft.com/php/post.php?t=2044&qw=13#p20841 and the one where I mention manufacturing ass for the purpost of LotR kicking it at: http://yaysoft.com/php/post.php?t=2044&qw=13#p20845

It took me all of 3 minutes to add, I should have done that long ago.

∴ M. Bean | 19-Dec-2002 4:14am est | #1154

Keith (http://www.keithdevens.com/) wrote:

Nice.

BTW, not totally related, but I have a similar feature in my weblog that I stuck in there for the heck of it in case I wanted it, but I don't currently use it...

http://www.keithdevens.com/weblog/?2002-12-19#id3209

Keith | 19-Dec-2002 4:18am est | http://www.keithdevens.com/ | #1155

roy wrote:

here is a message board post that i read. no direct link, so i just copied it...

***************************************
A Monumental Film? No where near.
What can I say: This was a major disappointment. It was contrived of everything cliche and loitered with ridiculous editing. What was good about fellowship is all gone in this uncannily incoherent and malformed production. The magic is lost. And sadly, so is the viewer. It cuts from one story to another so abruptly that no sustainable coherence is left behind. And, unlike Fellowship, this movie is as cheeseball as it gets. The costumes, the acting, the "surprises" all seem so utterly contrived that I was left squirming in my seat. I have read the Two Towers and to say this movie takes advantage of Tolkien's works is an understatement. Within the first twenty minutes I gave up all hope that what I read in the book would be actualized on screen. With the exception of the Frodo, Sam and Gollum storyline and a few breathtaking visuals (the Oliphaunts, Nazgul and the Black Gates), this film had nothing that floored me to my seat. Even the much anticipated "Helm's Deep" battle was a mess. Just when tension and suspense would build in the scene, it would cut somewhere else. None of the characters are more fleshed out by the film either. They are more trivialized than anything. The characters are more walking insults to the audience's intelligence than anything. They are more like a joke than a character (Gimli for instance). I don't understand how people are actually heralding this film as monumental. It's just not worth it. I appreciate what Jackson is trying to do, but ultimately he's transformed a rich, lush, enlivened world into a Saturday morning, cheeseball serial. That alone, is a real shame.
***************************************

found here: http://www.cinecon.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=2293

∴ roy | 19-Dec-2002 12:07pm est | #1158

Feel free to post a comment below. Please see my comment policy.

Formatting Rules (No HTML):

  • **bold**, *italic*, _underlined_, --strikeout--
  • "text"="url" creates a link, and URLs are auto-highlighted
  • Blockquote: Like e-mail, begin paragraph with > (greater-than sign)
  • Lists: begin paragraph with *,-, or + (unordered), or # (ordered)
  • Code block: ?!code:language=perl|php|sql|javascript|etc.{\n}...{\n}?!/code

:
(will be your IP address if blank)
: (optional)
(Will not be shown on site)

: (optional)
:

July 2010
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031



RSS feed RSS feed for Keith's Weblog
Atom feed Atom feed for Keith's Weblog
Weblog archive
Recent comments
  on 2 posts

Recent comments XML

DTerm: A command line anywhere and everywhere

They wrote back. It turns out that,​when I launched it a second time, I​was...

Revence: Jul 26, 2:28am

Minimum Wage Increase Leads to Higher Teen Unemployment Rate - WSJ.com

Sorry, I don't believe it.  My son​was working as a dishwasher, making​$10/...

Bryan Price: Jul 25, 2:50pm

Generated in about 0.125s.

(Used 8 db queries)