<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Keith's Weblog: Comments on &quot;CMS To Do List&quot;</title>
		<description>Keith's Weblog: Comments on &quot;CMS To Do List&quot;, posted on August 22, 2002</description>
		<link>http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2002/Aug/22/CMSToDoList</link>

		<category>Programming</category>
		<language>en-us</language>
		

		<item>
			<title>by Moss</title>
			<link>http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2002/Aug/22/CMSToDoList#comment730</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithdevens.com/weblog/2675#comment730</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;You may already have thought of this, but: for making the URLs nice, consider having your script get the name of the requested page from the path info, rather than from the cgi query string. This way it looks fairly nice even without mod_rewrite, it uses a very simple rewrite rule, and it should be pretty easy to make rewriting optional.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>by Keith</title>
			<link>http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2002/Aug/22/CMSToDoList#comment731</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithdevens.com/weblog/2675#comment731</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;Yeah, that's basically what I was going to do. If the path info is translated into what would normally be querystring values, then it'll be easy to make mod_rewrite optional. I had thought the same thing, and that's one of the goals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;Check out my &lt;a href=&quot;/weblog/?id2658&quot;&gt;fun with mod_rewrite post&lt;/a&gt; where I go into the rules I'm going to use.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>by Dean Peters</title>
			<link>http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2002/Aug/22/CMSToDoList#comment732</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithdevens.com/weblog/2675#comment732</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;ADODB ... yes ... please&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>by Keith</title>
			<link>http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2002/Aug/22/CMSToDoList#comment734</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithdevens.com/weblog/2675#comment734</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p class=&quot;st-markup&quot;&gt;Yeah, I was just being fair to PearDB because I haven't tried it yet &lt;img class=&quot;smiley&quot; src=&quot;/images/smiley_side.gif&quot; alt=&quot;Smiley&quot; /&gt; But ADODB is probably a given should I use any database abstraction at all.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
